Childfree in India..
(PHOTO-ILLUSTRATION BY RANDAL FORD FOR TIME)
Every now and then, magazines like Time throw in a cover story that
aims to capture fringe trends that are fast becoming mainstream.
This week’s story on Americans and childfree-ness is one such.
Childfree forums and concerns are not new to the internet, but the TIME
doing a cover story makes it a ‘legitimate’ trend,so to speak.
The cover shows a totally model-like couple with smug expressions,
who claim, as the byline says provocatively, ‘ When having it all means
not having children.’
Husband grinned when he saw the picture on the cover. ” Is that
couple supposed to represent us?” he asked sarcastically.” Fuck, they
look as fake as those pictures of saccharine families around the dinner
table”.
He is right of course. We are childfree by choice and so are
virtually 90% of our friends. But none of us can claim to ‘have it all’
just because we don’t have kids. Same goes for people who choose to have
kids.
All of us,kids or not, have our usual troubles. Jobs, family, stress,
money, health, meaning of life- all the urban worries that plague the
modern urban person.
However, the very fact that most of our socialization happens with
similar couples/ singles who don’t have kids says volumes about how
profoundly life-changing having/ not having kids is in our society.
Virtually all our best friends are childfree .I am talking about people
in the creative/content side of media, which is perhaps the most
socially/ economically flexible set in India. Even here, having kids or
not having kids profoundly affects your life plans or orientation.
Even in our bubble like slice of life, I have seen how people drift
apart depending on the kids in their lives. This is largely because of
the different priorities people have depending on kids. Finances,
attitudes, daily lifestyle, aspirations become quite different as you
become/ not become a parent.
In India, in certain set at least, people are available to care for
young kids and the burden is less on young mothers compared to those in
the west. So it is not always the sheer ‘need’ of childcare that changes
the pattern. But the priorities, which for parents, are usually kids,
that moulds the life so to speak.
Parents naturally socialize with other parents, prioritize kids
education when it comes to their decision to stay in a particular
locality or job, go to holidays that their kids can enjoy, spend the
time and energy on moulding the young child, plan financially keeping
kids in mind.
The childfree tend to, in my experience, lead more flexible and footloosish lives, compared to parents.
No choice exists in vacuum. In Indian society having kids is defacto
and voluntarily not having kids is so exceptional ( except in small
bubbles like media, where childfree are almost equal in number), that
there is very little mainstream discussion about it ( except
stray articles like this or
this )
. Unlike in American media, where every lifestyle choice has a name and
an acronym ( GINK means ‘green inclination no kids’, for example!! By
god one has to give it to the Americans!!), in India the term child-free
is virtually unknown. Our entire social structure and notion of family
is built around having kids. Most of our non-Indian friends/ colleagues
are impressed by the sheer childfriendliness of our society. Majority of
the people’s lives are structured around their kids. So not having kids
becomes a matter of choice while having kids is more or less given.
But it has been my observation that the number of childfree are on
the rise and the raised eye brows have been replaced by understanding
smiles in the recent years. My small town extended family, for example,
completely accepts our decision not to have kids. Our parents would have
been happier with grandkids but they see that we don’t want kids and
have accepted our choice more or less happily.
Because there are so few Indian people who decide not to have kids ,
and so many who decide to have some, there is no threat or concern for
population or social change.
Most childfree come from a certain social / economic set that excuses
their behaviour as ‘oh they are quite different/ western types’ by
majority of the people.
Our society for centuries has gleefully championed values of duty
and familial responsibility over all others, and since globalization, we
have gone through major social changes that have challenged this
tradition. I have observed that many people, with or without kids,
find childfree life quite an extention of nuclear family and an
interesting new trend, if not a social staple. It struck me with force
during youth market researches I was involved in, where even small town
youngsters ( especially girls) look at childfree ness as some sort of
glamourous, ‘modern’ choice.
Most of my western european friends are amazed at the lack of
friction between childfree and mainstream society in India. I think that
because of awareness and exposure, ‘different’ lifestyles are still
seen as ‘harmless curiosities’ and childfree-ness is one of them.
Of course, I am generalizing grossly, but I do have at least a decade
of observation, market researches on youth and insider status as a
childfree woman from small town to back some of these statements:)
In India, not having kids is sort of accepted as a fringe social
trend and it will be decades before it becomes mainstream enough for
magazines to write cover stories about it.
Coming back to TIME, Americans, much like the other advanced
industrial nations, are having less number of kids and that one woman in
five is in fact, choosing not to have kids at all. Virtually all
advanced nations give attractive incentives to women to produce kids
since birth rate is steadily plummeting. Economists worry that a skewed
birth-death ratio would affect the future aging population.
Conservatives bemoan the death of traditional values while some
environmentalists declare that population growth is disastrous for
earth.
Internet is strife with childfree forums/ blogs that range from
genuine to rabid. Grave issues like ‘whether children should be allowed
on planes’ to ‘ whether there should be child-free restaurants’ are
discussed with passion. Most people on the forums say that they are not
anti-kids, but are rather against:
1. Assumption that everyone has to have kids to lead fulfilling life and blames those who don’t as selfish.
2. hyper parents who force their ill-mannered offspring on society without care
3. Baby obsessed culture that pressurizes women to equate motherhood with womanhood
I do surf these sites once in a while and do agree with the spirit on
the above points, but sometimes get amazed at the vitriol with which
these points are sometimes made. Like any other ‘alternative’ choice,
the child-free internetizens are quite vocal and aggressive. That is
also understandable if the whole world is assuming that you are somewhat
incomplete/ childish if you choose not to have kids. But I really think
there are more well-behaved kids than unruly ones, that more parents
try to control kids than not, that there are always going to be stupid
judgemental people in life that are best ignored and that if one has
made a choice that goes against the flow, one has to be confident about
it. Calling mothers ‘moos’ and ‘breeding cows’ is as unfair as being
called selfish and unfeminine for not wanting to be a mother. But then,
there are all kinds of corners on net and I like to believe that they
all add to the social dialogue ( not to mention provide hilarious
entertainment.)
I think, at least for a few privileged people, it boils down to
simple “Do you want kids in your life?” question. Some people do not
want to have kids because they do not feel the need of having kids. Some
people find kids limit their lives’ choices. Some people do not find
enough time or energy or money to dedicate to kids.
We for example, have never felt that need or desire. We realised
quite early on when we both were very young , that we are not ‘that’
fond of kids to change our lifestyle, nature and dreams, which would
have been compromised with a kid. It is lucky that we both found each
other because if one partner desires a child and one doesn’t, it becomes
quite a bad compromise no matter what you decide to do. We both firmly
believe that a kid is a big responsibility and kids should be given full
care and love. We both get along quite well with kids, especially
husband who works for one of the biggest kids’ brands in the world. But a
child has never been even on a radar as far as our future is concerned.
We do like the possibility that we are free to do anything without
having to think about another human being. And these range from stupid
irresponsible things to serious life-altering decisions.
I am not advocating any ‘lifestyle’ so to speak, but I do think that
if people are not sure whether they want to be parents or not: it is
better that they don’t become parents. One has no right to bring the
child into life with unsure mind, seriously. And all that BS about ‘you
will love your own child’, ‘you will adjust’, ‘so many people have kids
and yours will also raise itself’ actually works against the very
children it purports to advocate.
Of course, having kids is a rich and fulfilling experience. I am sure
people who have kids get a glimpse into growing mind and life that is
magical. I also think it gives people roots when they have kids and it
is a beautiful feeling. If one wants that feeling and is ready to choose
that , great. If one doesn’t, then we all should respect that choice.
There would always be judgements and marginalization, but hell, that comes with many choices, so be it.